Rubric

CT2 Rubric
CT2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Claim

Clearly state the claims for both positions.

2 pts

Full Marks
Student clearly presents the claims of each position.

0 pts

No Marks
Student does not clearly present the claims for either position.
2 pts
Explanation of the Issue

Present the issue with enough relevant detail to provide a clear understanding of the issue from the two perspectives (for and against).

5 pts

Excellent
Issue is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.

4 pts

Good
Issue/ problem to be considered is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.

3.5 pts

Fair
Issue is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/ or backgrounds unknown.

2.5 pts

Poor
Issue is stated without clarification or description.
5 pts
Evidence

Research and present the major argument for each position. Please only choose the one major argument for each position.

6 pts

Excellent
Information is taken from expert sources with enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.

5 pts

Good
Information is taken from expert sources with enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.

4.5 pts

Fair
Information is taken from expert sources with some interpretation/ evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.

3.5 pts

Poor
Information is taken from expert sources without any interpretation/ evaluation.
6 pts
Presentation of Positions

Present each position in an unbiased way. Provide enough information to illustrate the complexity of the issue. Present possible responses to the arguments from each presentation.

6 pts

Excellent
Each position is insightful, taking into account the complexities of the issue. Limits of each position are acknowledged.

5 pts

Good
Each position takes into account the complexities of the issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position.

4.5 pts

Fair
Specific position acknowledges different sides of an issue.

3.5 pts

Poor
Specific position/analysis is stated, but is simplistic and obvious.
6 pts
Writing Style and Grammar

1 pts

Excellent
All sentences are complete and grammatical. All words are chosen for their precise meanings. All new or unusual concepts are well-defined. Key concepts and theories are accurately and completely explained. Good, clear examples are used to illuminate concepts. Information is accurate. Paper has been spell-checked and proofread, and has no errors, and no rhetorical questions or slang.

0.8 pts

Good
All sentences are complete and grammatical. Most words are chosen for their precise meanings. Most new or unusual concepts are well-defined. The key concepts and theories are explained. Examples are clear. Information is accurate. Paper has been spell-checked and proofread, and has very few errors, and no rhetorical questions or slang.

0.7 pts

Poor
A few sentences are incomplete and/or ungrammatical. Words are not chosen for their precise meanings. New or unusual terms are not well-defined. The key concepts and theories are not explained. Examples are not clear. Information is mostly accurate. Paper has several spelling errors, rhetorical questions and/or uses of slang.

0 pts

Unacceptable
Many sentences are incomplete and/or ungrammatical. The author does not acknowledge that key words have precise meanings. Information is inaccurate. Paper has many spelling errors, rhetorical questions and/or uses of slang.
1 pts
Total Points: 20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *