• at least 300 words (no more than 450)
• key takeaways and major points of discussion plus,
• a critical/reflective response to each point- – examples:
  • what was interesting, controversial, meaningful about this and why? 
  • what could this be applied to in the real world, does it remind you of issues in other disciplines or industries, things you or people you know have experienced?
  • did the discussants miss something? have you experienced something that contradicts their claims? have they included diverse perspectives?

Your submission should be mostly critique and reflection. Some of you have not quite grasped the importance of reflection and critique in previous weeks. Do not just summarize the webinar. Practice using “I” statements, explaining the logic behind your claims of interest or learning, and demonstrate that you are engaging with the materials and thinking about how they apply outside of the facts presented.