Learning outcome: Demonstrate use of the three major (classical) theoretical perspectives in sociology to explain various social realities.
Music is not only sounds and words but also a form of communication and social interaction as well as a social institution. Let’s look a little deeper at how sociologists understand music and the music industry in the U.S.
- Review the major theoretical approaches in sociology (Table 1.2 and the full explanation of Structural-functionalism, Conflict theory or Symbolic interactionism in your book) along with the assumptions of each.
- Pick ONE and clearly state how proponents of this theory view society, social change and the social order. This should take several sentences and include textbook citations.
- In looking at music in society, what kinds of things would proponents of this theory examine to understand social relationships? (Use the "Farming and Locavores: How Sociological Perspectives Might View Food Consumption" and "Sociological Theories or Perspectives" in Table 1.1 in the chapter to help you along).
- For those looking at music/music industry through the structural-functionalist approach, what are the latent and manifest functions of music/the music industry? Are there any dysfunctions? Try to list as many as you can. For the conflict theorists, what are the sources of competition, coercion and power in music/the music industry? Which groups are competing and why? For the symbolic interactionists, what symbols do individuals use when interacting with one another through music? What kinds of small group interactions among or between those working in the music industry or those listening to music would tell us more about the role of music and the music industry here in the United States?
- Is your chosen theory a useful way of understanding music/the music industry as a social institution and form of interaction? Why/why not?

Leave a Reply