Morality and Religion

Part I

Explain the central features of the divine command theory, as articulated by Rachels. What is known as the Euthyphro dilemma? Do you think the arbitrariness problem is a fatal objection to the divine command theory or do you think the central features of the divine command theory can be salvaged? If so, how? Be mindful to take a clear position. Defend your position. (250 words)
 
Part II
As Rachels notes, the official moral teaching the Catholic Church rests on Aquinas theory of natural law. He says, The official position of the Catholic Church is that the use of artificial birth control impedes Gods plan for sex (procreation and unity), and is therefore wrong. According to the teaching of the Catholic Church, artificial birth control is unnatural (against Gods natural order) and therefore the use of artificial birth control is morally wrong. Do you agree with the Churchs reaching? Do you think procreation and unity are the only legitimate uses for sexual intercourse? Rachels argues that the argument for the Churchs position rests on the naturalistic fallacythat just because sex is for making babies does not mean it ought to be used exclusively for making babies. This is also known as the is-ought objection. Do you think Rachels objection undermines the Churchs teaching? (250 words)
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *