Write a 4 page paper on an interprofessional collaboration experience from your personal practice,

proposing suggestions on how to improve the collaboration presented in the Vila Health:

Collaboration for Change activity.

Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide

carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score:

 Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful

and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.

 Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial

resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature.

 Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an

interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature.

 Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals

and work together, citing the work of at least one author.

You will need to relate an experience that you have had collaborating on a project. This could be at

your current or former place of practice, or another relevant project that will enable you to address

the requirements. In addition to describing your experience, you should explain aspects of the

collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes, as well as

aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved.

A simplified gap-analysis approach may be useful:

 What happened?

 What went well?

 What did not go well?

 What should have happened?

 

After your personal reflection, examine the scenario in the Vila Health activity and discuss the ways

in which the interdisciplinary team did not collaborate effectively and the negative implications for the

human and financial resources of the interdisciplinary team and the organization as a whole.

Building on this investigation, identify at least one leadership best practice or strategy that you

believe would improve the team’s ability to achieve their goals. Be sure to identify the strategy and its

source or author and provide a brief rationale for your choice of strategy.

Additionally, identify at least one interdisciplinary collaboration best practice or strategy to help the

team achieve its goals and work more effectively together. Again, identify the strategy, its source,

and reasons why you think it will be effective.

You are encouraged to integrate lessons learned from your self-reflection to support and enrich your

discussion of the Vila Health activity.

 

Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Scoring Guide

 

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Reflect on an

interdisciplinary

collaboration

experience, noting

ways in which it was

successful and

unsuccessful in

achieving desired

outcomes.

 

Does not describe

an interdisciplinary

collaboration

experience.

 

Describes an

interdisciplinary

collaboration

experience, but the

reflection on the

success or failure to

achieve desired

outcomes is missing

or unclear.

 

Reflects on an

interdisciplinary

collaboration

experience, noting

ways in which it was

successful and

unsuccessful in

achieving desired

outcomes.

 

Reflects on an

interdisciplinary

collaboration experience,

noting ways in which it

was successful and

unsuccessful in achieving

desired outcomes.

Includes ways in which

reflective nursing practice

can help build a better

understanding of past

experiences to improve

future practice decisions.

 

Identify ways poor

collaboration can

result in inefficient

management of

human and financial

resources,

supported by

evidence from the

literature.

 

Does not Identify

ways poor

collaboration can

result in inefficient

management of

human and financial

resources.

 

Identifies poor

collaboration, but

does not address how

it can result in

inefficient

management of

human and financial

resources or does not

provide supporting

evidence from the

literature.

 

Identifies how poor

collaboration can

result in inefficient

management of

human and financial

resources

supported by

evidence from the

literature.

 

Identifies how poor

collaboration can result in

inefficient management of

human and financial

resources supported by

evidence from the

literature. Multiple authors

from the literature are

discussed.

 

Identify bestpractice

leadership

strategies from the

literature that would

improve an

interdisciplinary

team’s ability to

achieve its goals.

 

Does not identify

best-practice

leadership

strategies from the

literature that would

improve an

interdisciplinary

team’s ability to

achieve its goals.

 

Identifies leadership

strategies, but it is

unclear how they

would improve an

interdisciplinary

team’s ability to

achieve its goals, or

does not provide

supporting evidence

from the literature.

 

Identifies

bestpractice

leadership

strategies from the

literature that would

improve an

interdisciplinary

team’s ability to

achieve its goals.

 

Identifies best-practice

leadership strategies from

the literature that would

improve an

interdisciplinary team’s

ability to achieve its goals.

Multiple authors from the

literature are discussed.

 

Identify best

practice

interdisciplinary

collaboration

strategies to help a

team to achieve its

goals and work

together more

effectively.

 

Does not identify

best-practice

interdisciplinary

collaboration

strategies to help a

team to achieve its

goals and work

together more

effectively.

 

Identifies

interdisciplinary

collaboration

strategies, but it is

unclear how they

would help a team to

achieve its goals and

work together more

effectively together.

 

Identifies

bestpractice

interdisciplinary

collaboration

strategies to help a

team to achieve its

goals and work

together more

effectively.

 

Identifies best-practice

interdisciplinary

collaboration strategies to

help a team to achieve its

goals and work together

more effectively. Multiple

authors from the literature

are discussed.

 

Communicate via

video with clear

sound and light.

 

Does not

communicate

professionally in a

well-organized

presentation.

 

Does not

communicate via

video or video is

difficult to hear and

see.

 

Communicates via

video with clear

sound and light.

 

Communicates via video

with clear sound and light.

Content delivery is

focused, smooth, and

well-rehearsed.

 

The full reference

list is from relevant

and evidence-based

(published within 5

years) sources,

exhibiting nearly

 

Does not provide a

reference list of

relevant and/or

evidence-based

sources (published

within 5 years).

 

A majority of

reference list sources

are relevant and/or

evidence-based

(published within 5

 

The full reference

list is from relevant

and evidence-

based (published

within 5 years)

sources, exhibiting

 

The full reference list is

from relevant and

evidence-based

(published within 5 years)

sources, exhibiting

 

nearly

 

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX4010/210700/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html1/2 3/6/23, 2:12

PMCollaboration and Leadership Reflection Video Scoring Guide

CRITERIA flawless

adherence to APA

format.

 

NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC

 

years) submitted

with few APA errors.

 

PROFICIENT

flawless

adherence to APA

format.

 

DISTINGUISHED

flawless adherence to

APA format.

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX4010/210700/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html2/2


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *